|
November 2004 - Restitution
NOVEMBER 2004
OHIO COURTS MAY NO LONGER ORDER RESTITUTION TO THIRD PARTIES AS PART OF CRIMINAL SENTENCING
Ohio Courts may no longer require that a criminal defendant be required to pay restitution to third parties (including subrogated insurers) as part of the defendant's criminal sentence.
The new version of Ohio Revised Code § 2929.18 which went into effect on June 1, 2004 provides that “If the court imposes restitution, the court shall order that the restitution be made to the victim in open court…” and further states, “the amount the court orders as restitution shall not exceed the amount of economic loss suffered by the victim as a direct and proximate result of the commission of the offense.” This is to be contrasted with the former version of Ohio Revised Code § 2929.18 which provided that a restitution order “may include a requirement that reimbursement be made to third parties for amounts paid to or on behalf of the victim…”
As a result, subrogated insurers who previously had a practice of relying on criminal restitution orders to recover payments will want to amend this practice. Since they will not be able to rely on the criminal restitution order, it is important that subrogated insurers put these matters into litigation so that a civil judgment may be obtained. Additionally, because many of these “criminal acts” that give rise to subrogation claims involve intentional acts, subrogated insurers need to be aware of Ohio's one year statute of limitations for damages caused by intentional acts.
|